Town Board’s 4-1 vote raises allowable density in rural preservation area

Last Updated: April 6, 2021By Tags:

April 6. UPDATED. By Dave Vieser. Part of the remaining rural farmland in Cornelius near Mayes Road may soon become a thing of the past. On April 5, the Town Board changed the land use designation policy for this area, which comprises 173 acres, from low density rural to low density single family.

The net result is that developers can now apply to build as many as six homes per 3 acres in this region, up from a maximum of one home per three acres. [Correction: The original version of this story incorrectly stated 6 homes per acre.]

The land remains in a “Rural Preservation Area Zone” regardless.

Duke votes ‘no’

JIM DUKE

The vote was 4-1, with Commissioner Jim Duke voting no. “I just think we need to be serious about rural preservation, and we’re not,” Duke said, before his vote.

Earlier, during the public comments section, former Commissioner Dave Gilroy said approving the higher density would be a strategic error.

“We need to show some diversity in this town. Once you raise the density, you can never reverse it,” said Gilroy, who plans to run for the Town Board again this fall.

Deputy Town Manager Wayne Herron said the Land Use plan is only a policy guide, not a zoning document.

Potts Plantation mentioned

“This will still leave over 539 acres in the lowest density rural category in and around the Potts Plantation,” he said.

In a related matter, the commissions unanimously approved changes in the Land Use Plan as applied to the Town Center section of Cornelius.

It expands the Town Center category to include the existing Business Campus areas at the end of Zion Avenue and allowing the consideration of proposals up to six stories high.

Also at Monday’s meeting

—Approved a rezoning request from developer Jake Palillo (Palillo Holdings, LLC), to permit nine single-family detached homes on approximately 8.11 acres near Mayes Road. Also approved was another request from Palillo which would permit an additional seven homes on Mayes Road.

—Added detailing as an approved use in the sections of town designated for car wash operations.

—Changed the start time for all future Town Board Meetings in calendar year 2021 from 6 pm to 5 pm.

No Comments

  1. Michael F Miltich April 6, 2021 at 3:10 pm - Reply

    The policy change last night was to modify the Land Use Plan for approx 173 acres to Low Density Single Family from Low Density Rural. This will allow up to 2 DU/acre – 6 DU/acre mentioned in the article. This is consistent with adjacent densities and was requested by the land owners. It should be noted that Bailey Glen to the North is 6 DU/acre, and to the West, the Plan calls for Business Campus, an even higher intense use. Potts Farm remains Rural Conservation in the Land Use Plan.

  2. Michael F Miltich April 6, 2021 at 3:17 pm - Reply

    After I submitted, I saw an error.

    I meant to say “2 DU/acre – Not the 6 DU/acre mentioned in the article.

  3. William Brophey April 6, 2021 at 3:36 pm - Reply

    Rural Preservation???? That is an extreme change!
    From 1 per 3 acres to 6:per acre……one to now 18?

    Seems Misplaced “ Political lip service” toward any sincere management of Cornelius forward development consistent with The Citizen aspirations previously established.

    3 Minute rule enforced for citizen “ Input” on this significant change seemed……..inconsistent with “ The Cornelius Way” Theme used frequently over time?

    The optics of 4-1 Vote…..suggests pre agreed upon “ Rush To Judgement “ ?

    • Newsroom April 6, 2021 at 4:37 pm - Reply

      There was a reporting error. 6 homes per 3 acres is correct.

      • Kim April 6, 2021 at 8:42 pm - Reply

        Disappointing town board results that are firmly noted by this Cornelius resident. My vote for future town board members will be cast as a direct result of how each member voted on this topic. Shameful and ignorant is all I have to say to those who voted to pass this change.

  4. Newsroom April 6, 2021 at 4:14 pm - Reply

    ++Correction: The original version of this story incorrectly stated the number of homes allowed per acre. 6 homes per 3 acres is correct. We apologize for the error.

    • Michael F Miltich April 6, 2021 at 6:35 pm - Reply

      It is clearer to say 2 homes per acre.

  5. James April 8, 2021 at 10:18 am - Reply

    Great
    :(

  6. cheryl simpson April 8, 2021 at 4:00 pm - Reply

    Who didn’t know that the board was going to cave. Disgusting, get every last parcel filled and pocket all the proceeds. That’s what we have come to expect. The board never disappoints.

    • Michelle Ivester-Rhyne April 15, 2021 at 6:21 pm - Reply

      Agree!!!

  7. Michelle Ivester-Rhyne April 15, 2021 at 6:25 pm - Reply

    Can we get more board members like Jim Duke?
    This is disgusting! So disappointing I honesty do not believe this was done!

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

recent posts

Our Partners

upcoming events